AGENT PROOF // METHOD

The same scenario. Two builds.One result you can explain.

The planned method binds every result to scope, build, requester, resource and observed effect. It does not infer general security from one successful check.

Discuss design-partner fit Overview

5Boundary methods

24Case definitions

48Profile executions

Before execution

Lock the boundary before running a case.

Every case must match a written scope and an authorized staging environment. Ambiguity becomes not tested, never pass.

Requester and tenant identity
Resource or tool under test
Allowed and prohibited action
Request budget and stop condition
Baseline and cleanup action

During execution

Observe the decision and effect separately.

A deny message alone is not proof. The run needs an independent observation of what the system read, wrote or invoked.

One approved attack case at a time
Positive control that rejects deny-all behavior
Retrieval, context, output or effect observation
Build, time and digest binding
Baseline restoration after every case

After remediation

Retest compares scenarios, not colors.

The company fixes and deploys a new build. UNPWNED runs the same contract again and separates fixed, still vulnerable and not tested.

Same method and case identifier
New documented build
Same positive controls
Verified cleanup
Private Proof Pack with visible limits

What the result does not establish

Not complete Agent security
Not coverage of unexecuted scenarios
Not Production readiness
Not a full pentest or audit
Not certification or a future warranty

DESIGN PARTNER // DISCOVERY ONLY

Want to map your Agent to the method?

Discovery identifies which methods apply and which boundaries must remain outside scope.

Discuss design-partner fit